Robust Algorithms for the Secretary Problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In classical secretary problems, a sequence of n elements arrive in a uniformly random order, and we want to choose a single item, or a set of size K. The random order model allows us to escape from the strong lower bounds for the adversarial order setting, and excellent algorithms are known in this setting. However, one worrying aspect of these results is that the algorithms overfit to the model: they are not very robust. Indeed, if a few "outlier" arrivals are adversarially placed in the arrival sequence, the algorithms perform poorly. E.g., Dynkin's popular 1/e-secretary algorithm fails with even a single adversarial arrival. We investigate a robust version of the secretary problem. In the Byzantine Secretary model, we have two kinds of elements: green (good) and red (rogue). The values of all elements are chosen by the adversary. The green elements arrive at times uniformly randomly drawn from [0,1]. The red elements, however, arrive at adversarially chosen times. Naturally, the algorithm does not see these colors: how well can it solve secretary problems? We give algorithms which get value comparable to the value of the optimal green set minus the largest green item. Specifically, we give an algorithm to pick K elements that gets within (1-varepsilon) factor of the above benchmark, as long as K ≥ poly(varepsilon-1 log n). We extend this to the knapsack secretary problem, for large knapsack size K. For the single-item case, an analogous benchmark is the value of the second-largest green item. For value-maximization, we give a poly log^* n-competitive algorithm, using a multi-layered bucketing scheme that adaptively refines our estimates of second-max over time. For probability-maximization, we show the existence of a good randomized algorithm, using the minimax principle.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2021Online Adversarial Attackscited by 3
- 2026The Secretary Problem with Predictions and a Chosen Ordercited by 2
- 2026Non-Stationary Online Resource Allocation: Learning from a Single Samplecited by 1
- 2026Online Algorithms via Minimax and Posterior Matchingcited by 0
- 2026Online Algorithms via Minimax and Posterior Matching3 Aug 2026
- 2026Non-Stationary Online Resource Allocation: Learning from a Single Sample20 Feb 2026
- 2026The Secretary Problem with Predictions and a Chosen Order12 Jan 2026
- 2021Online Adversarial Attacks2 Mar 2021