mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Privacy-Preserving Adversarial Representation Learning in ASR: Reality or Illusion?

arXiv 1911.04913 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2019cs.CL cs.LGcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) is a key technology in many services and applications. This typically requires user devices to send their speech data to the cloud for ASR decoding. As the speech signal carries a lot of information about the speaker, this raises serious privacy concerns. As a solution, an encoder may reside on each user device which performs local computations to anonymize the representation. In this paper, we focus on the protection of speaker identity and study the extent to which users can be recognized based on the encoded representation of their speech as obtained by a deep encoder-decoder architecture trained for ASR. Through speaker identification and verification experiments on the Librispeech corpus with open and closed sets of speakers, we show that the representations obtained from a standard architecture still carry a lot of information about speaker identity. We then propose to use adversarial training to learn representations that perform well in ASR while hiding speaker identity. Our results demonstrate that adversarial training dramatically reduces the closed-set classification accuracy, but this does not translate into increased open-set verification error hence into increased protection of the speaker identity in practice. We suggest several possible reasons behind this negative result.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 8; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021The VoicePrivacy 2020 Challenge: Results and findingscited by 45
  2. 2021Fairness for Unobserved Characteristics: Insights from Technological Impacts on Queer Communitiescited by 40
  3. 2022Differentially Private Speaker Anonymizationcited by 16
  4. 2022A Review of Speech-centric Trustworthy Machine Learning: Privacy, Safety, and Fairnesscited by 13
  5. 2023Disentangling Voice and Content with Self-Supervision for Speaker Recognitioncited by 10
  6. 2022Decoupled Federated Learning for ASR with Non-IID Datacited by 6
  7. 2021Protecting gender and identity with disentangled speech representationscited by 5
  8. 2022FedNST: Federated Noisy Student Training for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 5
  9. 2022Generating gender-ambiguous voices for privacy-preserving speech recognitioncited by 5
  10. 2023Introducing Model Inversion Attacks on Automatic Speaker Recognitioncited by 4
  11. 2023Adversarial Representation Learning for Robust Privacy Preservation in Audiocited by 2
  12. 2021An Attribute-Aligned Strategy for Learning Speech Representationcited by 1
10 more
  1. 2021Evaluating X-vector-based Speaker Anonymization under White-box Assessmentcited by 1
  2. 2022Self-Supervised Speech Representations Preserve Speech Characteristics while Anonymizing Voicescited by 1
  3. 2023Representation Learning for Audio Privacy Preservation using Source Separation and Robust Adversarial Learningcited by 1
  4. 2026HearSay Benchmark: Do Audio LLMs Leak What They Hear?cited by 1
  5. 2022Privacy-Preserving Speech Representation Learning using Vector Quantizationcited by 0
  6. 2022Privacy-Utility Balanced Voice De-Identification Using Adversarial Examplescited by 0
  7. 2023Long-term Conversation Analysis: Exploring Utility and Privacycited by 0
  8. 2024Privacy-Preserving End-to-End Spoken Language Understandingcited by 0
  9. 2025Learning Private Representations through Entropy-based Adversarial Trainingcited by 0
  10. 2026Discriminating real and synthetic super-resolved audio samples using embedding-based classifierscited by 0