mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rate-Regularization and Generalization in VAEs

arXiv 1911.04594 ↗First posted 11 Nov 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Variational autoencoders optimize an objective that combines a reconstruction loss (the distortion) and a KL term (the rate). The rate is an upper bound on the mutual information, which is often interpreted as a regularizer that controls the degree of compression. We here examine whether inclusion of the rate also acts as an inductive bias that improves generalization. We perform rate-distortion analyses that control the strength of the rate term, the network capacity, and the difficulty of the generalization problem. Decreasing the strength of the rate paradoxically improves generalization in most settings, and reducing the mutual information typically leads to underfitting. Moreover, we show that generalization continues to improve even after the mutual information saturates, indicating that the gap on the bound (i.e. the KL divergence relative to the inference marginal) affects generalization. This suggests that the standard Gaussian prior is not an inductive bias that typically aids generalization, prompting work to understand what choices of priors improve generalization in VAEs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.