mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Investigation of Error Simulation Techniques for Learning Dialog Policies for Conversational Error Recovery

arXiv 1911.03378 ↗First posted 8 Nov 2019cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training dialog policies for speech-based virtual assistants requires a plethora of conversational data. The data collection phase is often expensive and time consuming due to human involvement. To address this issue, a common solution is to build user simulators for data generation. For the successful deployment of the trained policies into real world domains, it is vital that the user simulator mimics realistic conditions. In particular, speech-based assistants are heavily affected by automatic speech recognition and language understanding errors, hence the user simulator should be able to simulate similar errors. In this paper, we review the existing error simulation methods that induce errors at audio, phoneme, text, or semantic level; and conduct detailed comparisons between the audio-level and text-level methods. In the process, we improve the existing text-level method by introducing confidence score prediction and out-of-vocabulary word mapping. We also explore the impact of audio-level and text-level methods on learning a simple clarification dialog policy to recover from errors to provide insight on future improvement for both approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.