Bounds for the Number of Tests in Non-Adaptive Randomized Algorithms for Group Testing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the group testing problem with non-adaptive randomized algorithms. Several models have been discussed in the literature to determine how to randomly choose the tests. For a model cal M, let mcal M(n,d) be the minimum number of tests required to detect at most d defectives within n items, with success probability at least 1-δ, for some constant δ. In this paper, we study the measures ccal M(d)=limn→ ∞ fracmcal M(n,d)ln n mbox and ccal M=limd→ ∞ fracccal M(d)d. In the literature, the analyses of such models only give upper bounds for ccal M(d) and ccal M, and for some of them, the bounds are not tight. We give new analyses that yield tight bounds for ccal M(d) and ccal M for all the known models~cal M.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.
- 2023On Detecting Some Defective Items in Group Testingcited by 0
- 2023On Detecting Some Defective Items in Group Testing27 Jun 2023