mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning from Explanations with Neural Execution Tree

arXiv 1911.01352 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2019cs.CLcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While deep neural networks have achieved impressive performance on a range of NLP tasks, these data-hungry models heavily rely on labeled data, which restricts their applications in scenarios where data annotation is expensive. Natural language (NL) explanations have been demonstrated very useful additional supervision, which can provide sufficient domain knowledge for generating more labeled data over new instances, while the annotation time only doubles. However, directly applying them for augmenting model learning encounters two challenges: (1) NL explanations are unstructured and inherently compositional, which asks for a modularized model to represent their semantics, (2) NL explanations often have large numbers of linguistic variants, resulting in low recall and limited generalization ability. In this paper, we propose a novel Neural Execution Tree (NExT) framework to augment training data for text classification using NL explanations. After transforming NL explanations into executable logical forms by semantic parsing, NExT generalizes different types of actions specified by the logical forms for labeling data instances, which substantially increases the coverage of each NL explanation. Experiments on two NLP tasks (relation extraction and sentiment analysis) demonstrate its superiority over baseline methods. Its extension to multi-hop question answering achieves performance gain with light annotation effort.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 3.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language Processingcited by 126
  2. 2021When Can Models Learn From Explanations? A Formal Framework for Understanding the Roles of Explanation Datacited by 75
  3. 2024Usable XAI: 10 Strategies Towards Exploiting Explainability in the LLM Eracited by 45
  4. 2021Local Interpretations for Explainable Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 31
  5. 2023Large Language Model Instruction Following: A Survey of Progresses and Challengescited by 31
  6. 2021On the Diversity and Limits of Human Explanationscited by 30
  7. 2021Refining Language Models with Compositional Explanationscited by 27
  8. 2021A Trigger-Sense Memory Flow Framework for Joint Entity and Relation Extractioncited by 26
  9. 2022Using Interactive Feedback to Improve the Accuracy and Explainability of Question Answering Systems Post-Deploymentcited by 25
  10. 2022A survey on improving NLP models with human explanationscited by 15
  11. 2022CLUES: A Benchmark for Learning Classifiers using Natural Language Explanationscited by 9
  12. 2024On Evaluating Explanation Utility for Human-AI Decision Making in NLPcited by 9
6 more
  1. 2022Zero-Shot Classification by Logical Reasoning on Natural Language Explanationscited by 4
  2. 2023Leveraging Multiple Teachers for Test-Time Adaptation of Language-Guided Classifierscited by 2
  3. 2021AutoTriggER: Label-Efficient and Robust Named Entity Recognition with Auxiliary Trigger Extractioncited by 1
  4. 2024PEACH: Pretrained-embedding Explanation Across Contextual and Hierarchical Structurecited by 1
  5. 2021Teach me how to Label: Labeling Functions from Natural Language with Text-to-text Transformerscited by 0
  6. 2023Exploring Automatically Perturbed Natural Language Explanations in Relation Extractioncited by 0