Heteroscedastic Calibration of Uncertainty Estimators in Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The role of uncertainty quantification (UQ) in deep learning has become crucial with growing use of predictive models in high-risk applications. Though a large class of methods exists for measuring deep uncertainties, in practice, the resulting estimates are found to be poorly calibrated, thus making it challenging to translate them into actionable insights. A common workaround is to utilize a separate recalibration step, which adjusts the estimates to compensate for the miscalibration. Instead, we propose to repurpose the heteroscedastic regression objective as a surrogate for calibration and enable any existing uncertainty estimator to be inherently calibrated. In addition to eliminating the need for recalibration, this also regularizes the training process. Using regression experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed heteroscedastic calibration with two popular uncertainty estimators.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2023Exploring and Exploiting Uncertainty for Incomplete Multi-View Classificationcited by 13
- 2021Bayesian Autoencoders for Drift Detection in Industrial Environmentscited by 6
- 2024Advancing sleep detection by modelling weak label sets: A novel weakly supervised learning approachcited by 0
- 2024Advancing sleep detection by modelling weak label sets: A novel weakly supervised learning approach27 Feb 2024
- 2023Exploring and Exploiting Uncertainty for Incomplete Multi-View Classification11 Apr 2023
- 2021Bayesian Autoencoders for Drift Detection in Industrial Environments28 Jul 2021
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networks7 Jul 2021