mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Annual Interruption Rate as a KPI, its measurement and comparison

arXiv 1910.12200 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2019cs.DCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This article is divided into two chapters. The first chapter describes the failure rate as a KPI and studies its properties. The second one goes over ways to compare this KPI across two groups using the concepts of statistical hypothesis testing. In section 1., we will motivate the failure rate as a KPI (in Azure, it is dubbed `Annual Interruption Rate' or AIR. In section 3, we will discuss measuring failure rate from logs machines typically generate. In section 1.2, we will discuss the problem of measuring it from real-world data. In section 2.1, we will discuss the general concepts of hypothesis testing. In section 2.2, we will go over some general count distributions for modeling Azure reboots. In section 2.3, we will go over some experiments on applying various hypothesis tests to simulated data. In section 2.4, we will discuss some applications of this work like using these statistical methods to catch regressions in failure rate and how long we need to let changes to the system `bake' before we are reasonably sure they didn't regress failure rate.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.