mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Promoting the Knowledge of Source Syntax in Transformer NMT Is Not Needed

arXiv 1910.11218 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2019cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The utility of linguistic annotation in neural machine translation seemed to had been established in past papers. The experiments were however limited to recurrent sequence-to-sequence architectures and relatively small data settings. We focus on the state-of-the-art Transformer model and use comparably larger corpora. Specifically, we try to promote the knowledge of source-side syntax using multi-task learning either through simple data manipulation techniques or through a dedicated model component. In particular, we train one of Transformer attention heads to produce source-side dependency tree. Overall, our results cast some doubt on the utility of multi-task setups with linguistic information. The data manipulation techniques, recommended in previous works, prove ineffective in large data settings. The treatment of self-attention as dependencies seems much more promising: it helps in translation and reveals that Transformer model can very easily grasp the syntactic structure. An important but curious result is, however, that identical gains are obtained by using trivial "linear trees" instead of true dependencies. The reason for the gain thus may not be coming from the added linguistic knowledge but from some simpler regularizing effect we induced on self-attention matrices.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.