The Practicality of Stochastic Optimization in Imaging Inverse Problems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work we investigate the practicality of stochastic gradient descent and recently introduced variants with variance-reduction techniques in imaging inverse problems. Such algorithms have been shown in the machine learning literature to have optimal complexities in theory, and provide great improvement empirically over the deterministic gradient methods. Surprisingly, in some tasks such as image deblurring, many of such methods fail to converge faster than the accelerated deterministic gradient methods, even in terms of epoch counts. We investigate this phenomenon and propose a theory-inspired mechanism for the practitioners to efficiently characterize whether it is beneficial for an inverse problem to be solved by stochastic optimization techniques or not. Using standard tools in numerical linear algebra, we derive conditions on the spectral structure of the inverse problem for being a suitable application of stochastic gradient methods. Particularly, we show that, for an imaging inverse problem, if and only if its Hessain matrix has a fast-decaying eigenspectrum, then the stochastic gradient methods can be more advantageous than deterministic methods for solving such a problem. Our results also provide guidance on choosing appropriately the partition minibatch schemes, showing that a good minibatch scheme typically has relatively low correlation within each of the minibatches. Finally, we propose an accelerated primal-dual SGD algorithm in order to tackle another key bottleneck of stochastic optimization which is the heavy computation of proximal operators. The proposed method has fast convergence rate in practice, and is able to efficiently handle non-smooth regularization terms which are coupled with linear operators.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Proximal and Federated Random Reshufflingcited by 33
- 2024Revisiting inverse Hessian vector products for calculating influence functionscited by 10
- 2026Self-Supervised Learning from Noisy and Incomplete Datacited by 5
- 2021Stochastic Primal-Dual Deep Unrollingcited by 4
- 2022Accelerating Plug-and-Play Image Reconstruction via Multi-Stage Sketched Gradientscited by 2
- 2022Equivariance Regularization for Image Reconstructioncited by 1
- 2022Stochastic Primal-Dual Three Operator Splitting Algorithm with Extension to Equivariant Regularization-by-Denoisingcited by 0
- 2023Deep Learning and Bayesian inference for Inverse Problemscited by 0
- 2024Equivariant Test-Time Training with Operator Sketching for Imaging Inverse Problemscited by 0
- 2026Self-Supervised Learning from Noisy and Incomplete Data6 Jan 2026
- 2024Equivariant Test-Time Training with Operator Sketching for Imaging Inverse Problems8 Nov 2024
- 2024Revisiting inverse Hessian vector products for calculating influence functions25 Sep 2024
- 2023Deep Learning and Bayesian inference for Inverse Problems28 Aug 2023
- 2022Stochastic Primal-Dual Three Operator Splitting Algorithm with Extension to Equivariant Regularization-by-Denoising2 Aug 2022
- 2022Accelerating Plug-and-Play Image Reconstruction via Multi-Stage Sketched Gradients14 Mar 2022
- 2022Equivariance Regularization for Image Reconstruction10 Feb 2022
- 2021Stochastic Primal-Dual Deep Unrolling19 Oct 2021
- 2021Proximal and Federated Random Reshuffling12 Feb 2021