Signal Combination for Language Identification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Google's multilingual speech recognition system combines low-level acoustic signals with language-specific recognizer signals to better predict the language of an utterance. This paper presents our experience with different signal combination methods to improve overall language identification accuracy. We compare the performance of a lattice-based ensemble model and a deep neural network model to combine signals from recognizers with that of a baseline that only uses low-level acoustic signals. Experimental results show that the deep neural network model outperforms the lattice-based ensemble model, and it reduced the error rate from 5.5% in the baseline to 4.3%, which is a 21.8% relative reduction.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Streaming End-to-End Multilingual Speech Recognition with Joint Language Identificationcited by 24
- 2022Attentive Temporal Pooling for Conformer-based Streaming Language Identification in Long-form Speechcited by 6
- 2023Confidence-based Ensembles of End-to-End Speech Recognition Modelscited by 4
- 2024Improving Multilingual ASR in the Wild Using Simple N-best Re-rankingcited by 2
- 2024Improving Multilingual ASR in the Wild Using Simple N-best Re-ranking27 Sep 2024
- 2023Confidence-based Ensembles of End-to-End Speech Recognition Models27 Jun 2023
- 2022Streaming End-to-End Multilingual Speech Recognition with Joint Language Identification13 Sep 2022
- 2022Attentive Temporal Pooling for Conformer-based Streaming Language Identification in Long-form Speech24 Feb 2022