Towards better healthcare: What could and should be automated?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While artificial intelligence (AI) and other automation technologies might lead to enormous progress in healthcare, they may also have undesired consequences for people working in the field. In this interdisciplinary study, we capture empirical evidence of not only what healthcare work could be automated, but also what should be automated. We quantitatively investigate these research questions by utilizing probabilistic machine learning models trained on thousands of ratings, provided by both healthcare practitioners and automation experts. Based on our findings, we present an analytical tool (Automatability-Desirability Matrix) to support policymakers and organizational leaders in developing practical strategies on how to harness the positive power of automation technologies, while accompanying change and empowering stakeholders in a participatory fashion.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Benchmark datasets driving artificial intelligence development fail to capture the needs of medical professionalscited by 16
- 2025From Data-Driven to Purpose-Driven Artificial Intelligence: Systems Thinking for Data-Analytic Automation of Patient Carecited by 0
- 2026From Synthetic Data to Real Restorations: Diffusion Model for Patient-specific Dental Crown Completioncited by 0
- 2026From Synthetic Data to Real Restorations: Diffusion Model for Patient-specific Dental Crown Completion27 Mar 2026
- 2025From Data-Driven to Purpose-Driven Artificial Intelligence: Systems Thinking for Data-Analytic Automation of Patient Care16 Jun 2025
- 2022Benchmark datasets driving artificial intelligence development fail to capture the needs of medical professionals18 Jan 2022