mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparing Greedy Constructive Heuristic Subtour Elimination Methods for the Traveling Salesman Problem

arXiv 1910.08625 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2019cs.AI cs.DC math.OCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper further defines the class of fragment constructive heuristics used to compute feasible solutions for the Traveling Salesman Problem into arc-greedy and node-greedy subclasses. Since these subclasses of heuristics can create subtours, two known methodologies for subtour elimination on symmetric instances are reviewed and are expanded to cover asymmetric problem instances. This paper introduces a third novel methodology, the Greedy Tracker, and compares it to both known methodologies. Computational results are generated across multiple symmetric and asymmetric instances. The results demonstrate the Greedy Tracker is the fastest method for preventing subtours for instances below 400 nodes. A distinction between fragment constructive heuristics and the subtour elimination methodology used to ensure the feasibility of resulting solutions enables the introduction of a new node-greedy fragment heuristic called Ordered Greedy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.