Machine learning and glioma imaging biomarkers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Aim: To review how machine learning (ML) is applied to imaging biomarkers in neuro-oncology, in particular for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response monitoring. Materials and Methods: The PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched for articles published before September 2018 using relevant search terms. The search strategy focused on articles applying ML to high-grade glioma biomarkers for treatment response monitoring, prognosis, and prediction. Results: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is typically used throughout the patient pathway because routine structural imaging provides detailed anatomical and pathological information and advanced techniques provide additional physiological detail. Using carefully chosen image features, ML is frequently used to allow accurate classification in a variety of scenarios. Rather than being chosen by human selection, ML also enables image features to be identified by an algorithm. Much research is applied to determining molecular profiles, histological tumour grade, and prognosis using MRI images acquired at the time that patients first present with a brain tumour. Differentiating a treatment response from a post-treatment-related effect using imaging is clinically important and also an area of active study (described here in one of two Special Issue publications dedicated to the application of ML in glioma imaging). Conclusion: Although pioneering, most of the evidence is of a low level, having been obtained retrospectively and in single centres. Studies applying ML to build neuro-oncology monitoring biomarker models have yet to show an overall advantage over those using traditional statistical methods. Development and validation of ML models applied to neuro-oncology require large, well-annotated datasets, and therefore multidisciplinary and multi-centre collaborations are necessary.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Prediction of MGMT Methylation Status of Glioblastoma using Radiomics and Latent Space Shape Featurescited by 3
- 2021Predicting survival of glioblastoma from automatic whole-brain and tumor segmentation of MR imagescited by 1
- 2021Machine Learning and Glioblastoma: Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers in 2021cited by 0
- 2025The added value for MRI radiomics and deep-learning for glioblastoma prognostication compared to clinical and molecular informationcited by 0
- 2025The added value for MRI radiomics and deep-learning for glioblastoma prognostication compared to clinical and molecular information21 Jul 2025
- 2021Prediction of MGMT Methylation Status of Glioblastoma using Radiomics and Latent Space Shape Features25 Sep 2021
- 2021Predicting survival of glioblastoma from automatic whole-brain and tumor segmentation of MR images25 Sep 2021
- 2021Machine Learning and Glioblastoma: Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers in 202115 Apr 2021