Characterizing Deep Learning Training Workloads on Alibaba-PAI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern deep learning models have been exploited in various domains, including computer vision (CV), natural language processing (NLP), search and recommendation. In practical AI clusters, workloads training these models are run using software frameworks such as TensorFlow, Caffe, PyTorch and CNTK. One critical issue for efficiently operating practical AI clouds, is to characterize the computing and data transfer demands of these workloads, and more importantly, the training performance given the underlying software framework and hardware configurations. In this paper, we characterize deep learning training workloads from Platform of Artificial Intelligence (PAI) in Alibaba. We establish an analytical framework to investigate detailed execution time breakdown of various workloads using different training architectures, to identify performance bottleneck. Results show that weight/gradient communication during training takes almost 62% of the total execution time among all our workloads on average. The computation part, involving both GPU computing and memory access, are not the biggest bottleneck based on collective behavior of the workloads. We further evaluate attainable performance of the workloads on various potential software/hardware mappings, and explore implications on software architecture selection and hardware configurations. We identify that 60% of PS/Worker workloads can be potentially sped up when ported to the AllReduce architecture exploiting the high-speed NVLink for GPU interconnect, and on average 1.7X speedup can be achieved when Ethernet bandwidth is upgraded from 25 Gbps to 100 Gbps.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2022GEMEL: Model Merging for Memory-Efficient, Real-Time Video Analytics at the Edgecited by 32
- 2021Characterization and Prediction of Deep Learning Workloads in Large-Scale GPU Datacenterscited by 31
- 2025ServeGen: Workload Characterization and Generation of Large Language Model Serving in Productioncited by 29
- 2023TRANSOM: An Efficient Fault-Tolerant System for Training LLMscited by 12
- 2022Deep Learning Workload Scheduling in GPU Datacenters: Taxonomy, Challenges and Visioncited by 6
- 2022COMET: A Comprehensive Cluster Design Methodology for Distributed Deep Learning Trainingcited by 2
- 2023Baechi: Fast Device Placement of Machine Learning Graphscited by 2
- 2024Towards Universal Performance Modeling for Machine Learning Training on Multi-GPU Platformscited by 1
- 2023On the Burstiness of Distributed Machine Learning Trafficcited by 0
- 2026CARB: A Characterization-Guided Framework for CNN Inference Cost Prediction and Deployment Screeningcited by 0
- 2026The Life of a Token: from Words to Bits on the Wirecited by 0
- 2026The Life of a Token: from Words to Bits on the Wire17 Sep 2026
- 2026CARB: A Characterization-Guided Framework for CNN Inference Cost Prediction and Deployment Screening11 Aug 2026
- 2025ServeGen: Workload Characterization and Generation of Large Language Model Serving in Production15 May 2025
- 2024Towards Universal Performance Modeling for Machine Learning Training on Multi-GPU Platforms19 Apr 2024
- 2023On the Burstiness of Distributed Machine Learning Traffic30 Dec 2023
- 2023TRANSOM: An Efficient Fault-Tolerant System for Training LLMs16 Oct 2023
- 2023Baechi: Fast Device Placement of Machine Learning Graphs20 Jan 2023
- 2022COMET: A Comprehensive Cluster Design Methodology for Distributed Deep Learning Training30 Nov 2022
- 2022Deep Learning Workload Scheduling in GPU Datacenters: Taxonomy, Challenges and Vision24 May 2022
- 2022GEMEL: Model Merging for Memory-Efficient, Real-Time Video Analytics at the Edge19 Jan 2022
- 2021Characterization and Prediction of Deep Learning Workloads in Large-Scale GPU Datacenters3 Sep 2021