mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

What You See May Not Be What You Get: UCB Bandit Algorithms Robust to ε-Contamination

arXiv 1910.05625 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2019stat.ML cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motivated by applications of bandit algorithms in education, we consider a stochastic multi-armed bandit problem with varepsilon-contaminated rewards. We allow an adversary to give arbitrary unbounded contaminated rewards with full knowledge of the past and future. We impose the constraint that for each time t the proportion of contaminated rewards for any action is less than or equal to varepsilon. We derive concentration inequalities for two robust mean estimators for sub-Gaussian distributions in the varepsilon-contamination context. We define the varepsilon-contaminated stochastic bandit problem and use our robust mean estimators to give two variants of a robust Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) algorithm, crUCB. Using regret derived from only the underlying stochastic rewards, both variants of crUCB achieve O (√KTlog T) regret for small enough contamination proportions. Our simulations assume small horizons, reflecting the newly explored setting of bandits in education. We show that in certain adversarial regimes crUCB not only outperforms algorithms designed for stochastic (UCB1) and adversarial (EXP3) bandits but also those that have "best of both worlds" guarantees (EXP3++ and TsallisInf) even when our constraint on the proportion of contaminated rewards is broken.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

6 papers.