Policy Optimization Through Approximate Importance Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent policy optimization approaches (Schulman et al., 2015a; 2017) have achieved substantial empirical successes by constructing new proxy optimization objectives. These proxy objectives allow stable and low variance policy learning, but require small policy updates to ensure that the proxy objective remains an accurate approximation of the target policy value. In this paper we derive an alternative objective that obtains the value of the target policy by applying importance sampling (IS). However, the basic importance sampled objective is not suitable for policy optimization, as it incurs too high variance in policy updates. We therefore introduce an approximation that allows us to directly trade-off the bias of approximation with the variance in policy updates. We show that our approximation unifies previously developed approaches and allows us to interpolate between them. We develop a practical algorithm by optimizing the introduced objective with proximal policy optimization techniques (Schulman et al., 2017). We also provide a theoretical analysis of the introduced policy optimization objective demonstrating bias-variance trade-off. We empirically demonstrate that the resulting algorithm improves upon state of the art on-policy policy optimization on continuous control benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024Reflective Policy Optimizationcited by 3
- 2023Parallel bootstrap-based on-policy deep reinforcement learning for continuous flow control applicationscited by 2
- 2023Absolute Policy Optimizationcited by 2
- 2024Reflective Policy Optimization6 Jun 2024
- 2023Absolute Policy Optimization20 Oct 2023
- 2023Parallel bootstrap-based on-policy deep reinforcement learning for continuous flow control applications24 Apr 2023