SmoothFool: An Efficient Framework for Computing Smooth Adversarial Perturbations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks are susceptible to adversarial manipulations in the input domain. The extent of vulnerability has been explored intensively in cases of ℓp-bounded and ℓp-minimal adversarial perturbations. However, the vulnerability of DNNs to adversarial perturbations with specific statistical properties or frequency-domain characteristics has not been sufficiently explored. In this paper, we study the smoothness of perturbations and propose SmoothFool, a general and computationally efficient framework for computing smooth adversarial perturbations. Through extensive experiments, we validate the efficacy of the proposed method for both the white-box and black-box attack scenarios. In particular, we demonstrate that: (i) there exist extremely smooth adversarial perturbations for well-established and widely used network architectures, (ii) smoothness significantly enhances the robustness of perturbations against state-of-the-art defense mechanisms, (iii) smoothness improves the transferability of adversarial perturbations across both data points and network architectures, and (iv) class categories exhibit a variable range of susceptibility to smooth perturbations. Our results suggest that smooth APs can play a significant role in exploring the vulnerability extent of DNNs to adversarial examples.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2021Rethinking the Backdoor Attacks' Triggers: A Frequency Perspectivecited by 155
- 2023How Deep Learning Sees the World: A Survey on Adversarial Attacks & Defensescited by 65
- 2021AdvDrop: Adversarial Attack to DNNs by Dropping Informationcited by 55
- 2024Generalization Bound and New Algorithm for Clean-Label Backdoor Attackcited by 11
- 2022Robust Ensemble Morph Detection with Domain Generalizationcited by 7
- 2022Revisiting Outer Optimization in Adversarial Trainingcited by 4
- 2025LISArD: Learning Image Similarity to Defend Against Gray-box Adversarial Attackscited by 3
- 2022Hide and Seek: on the Stealthiness of Attacks against Deep Learning Systemscited by 2
- 2025ZQBA: Zero Query Black-box Adversarial Attackcited by 1
- 2026AdvSerial: Physical Adversarial Attacks on Infrastructure-mounted Pedestrian Detectors via Semantic Feature Suppressioncited by 1
- 2024Showing Many Labels in Multi-label Classification Models: An Empirical Study of Adversarial Examplescited by 0
- 2026Identifying Adversary Characteristics from an Observed Attackcited by 0
- 2026AdvSerial: Physical Adversarial Attacks on Infrastructure-mounted Pedestrian Detectors via Semantic Feature Suppression19 Jul 2026
- 2026Identifying Adversary Characteristics from an Observed Attack5 Mar 2026
- 2025ZQBA: Zero Query Black-box Adversarial Attack1 Oct 2025
- 2025LISArD: Learning Image Similarity to Defend Against Gray-box Adversarial Attacks27 Feb 2025
- 2024Showing Many Labels in Multi-label Classification Models: An Empirical Study of Adversarial Examples26 Sep 2024
- 2024Generalization Bound and New Algorithm for Clean-Label Backdoor Attack2 Jun 2024
- 2023How Deep Learning Sees the World: A Survey on Adversarial Attacks & Defenses18 May 2023
- 2022Robust Ensemble Morph Detection with Domain Generalization16 Sep 2022
- 2022Revisiting Outer Optimization in Adversarial Training2 Sep 2022
- 2022Hide and Seek: on the Stealthiness of Attacks against Deep Learning Systems31 May 2022
- 2021AdvDrop: Adversarial Attack to DNNs by Dropping Information20 Aug 2021
- 2021Rethinking the Backdoor Attacks' Triggers: A Frequency Perspective7 Apr 2021