Operational Calibration: Debugging Confidence Errors for DNNs in the Field
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Trained DNN models are increasingly adopted as integral parts of software systems, but they often perform deficiently in the field. A particularly damaging problem is that DNN models often give false predictions with high confidence, due to the unavoidable slight divergences between operation data and training data. To minimize the loss caused by inaccurate confidence, operational calibration, i.e., calibrating the confidence function of a DNN classifier against its operation domain, becomes a necessary debugging step in the engineering of the whole system. Operational calibration is difficult considering the limited budget of labeling operation data and the weak interpretability of DNN models. We propose a Bayesian approach to operational calibration that gradually corrects the confidence given by the model under calibration with a small number of labeled operation data deliberately selected from a larger set of unlabeled operation data. The approach is made effective and efficient by leveraging the locality of the learned representation of the DNN model and modeling the calibration as Gaussian Process Regression. Comprehensive experiments with various practical datasets and DNN models show that it significantly outperformed alternative methods, and in some difficult tasks it eliminated about 71% to 97% high-confidence (>0.9) errors with only about 10% of the minimal amount of labeled operation data needed for practical learning techniques to barely work.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Calibration and Correctness of Language Models for Codecited by 49
- 2024MeteoRA: Multiple-tasks Embedded LoRA for Large Language Modelscited by 14
- 2021PatchCensor: Patch Robustness Certification for Transformers via Exhaustive Testingcited by 11
- 2021A Review and Refinement of Surprise Adequacycited by 9
- 2025Open the Oyster: Empirical Evaluation and Improvement of Code Reasoning Confidence in LLMscited by 1
- 2023Understanding the Complexity and Its Impact on Testing in ML-Enabled Systemscited by 0
- 2025Open the Oyster: Empirical Evaluation and Improvement of Code Reasoning Confidence in LLMs4 Nov 2025
- 2024MeteoRA: Multiple-tasks Embedded LoRA for Large Language Models19 May 2024
- 2024Calibration and Correctness of Language Models for Code3 Feb 2024
- 2023Understanding the Complexity and Its Impact on Testing in ML-Enabled Systems10 Jan 2023
- 2021PatchCensor: Patch Robustness Certification for Transformers via Exhaustive Testing19 Nov 2021
- 2021A Review and Refinement of Surprise Adequacy10 Mar 2021