mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Joint Diacritization, Lemmatization, Normalization, and Fine-Grained Morphological Tagging

arXiv 1910.02267 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2019cs.CLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semitic languages can be highly ambiguous, having several interpretations of the same surface forms, and morphologically rich, having many morphemes that realize several morphological features. This is further exacerbated for dialectal content, which is more prone to noise and lacks a standard orthography. The morphological features can be lexicalized, like lemmas and diacritized forms, or non-lexicalized, like gender, number, and part-of-speech tags, among others. Joint modeling of the lexicalized and non-lexicalized features can identify more intricate morphological patterns, which provide better context modeling, and further disambiguate ambiguous lexical choices. However, the different modeling granularity can make joint modeling more difficult. Our approach models the different features jointly, whether lexicalized (on the character-level), where we also model surface form normalization, or non-lexicalized (on the word-level). We use Arabic as a test case, and achieve state-of-the-art results for Modern Standard Arabic, with 20% relative error reduction, and Egyptian Arabic (a dialectal variant of Arabic), with 11% reduction.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

12 papers.