Proof-of-Stake Longest Chain Protocols: Security vs Predictability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Nakamoto longest chain protocol is remarkably simple and has been proven to provide security against any adversary with less than 50% of the total hashing power. Proof-of-stake (PoS) protocols are an energy efficient alternative; however existing protocols adopting Nakamoto's longest chain design achieve provable security only by allowing long-term predictability (which have serious security implications). In this paper, we prove that a natural longest chain PoS protocol with similar predictability as Nakamoto's PoW protocol can achieve security against any adversary with less than 1/(1+e) fraction of the total stake. Moreover we propose a new family of longest chain PoS protocols that achieve security against a 50% adversary, while only requiring short-term predictability. Our proofs present a new approach to analyzing the formal security of blockchains, based on a notion of adversary-proof convergence.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024Proof-of-Learning with Incentive Securitycited by 4
- 2025Game of Trust: How Trustworthy Does Your Blockchain Think You Are?cited by 0
- 2025Game of Trust: How Trustworthy Does Your Blockchain Think You Are?20 May 2025
- 2024Proof-of-Learning with Incentive Security13 Apr 2024