mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep learning at scale for subgrid modeling in turbulent flows

arXiv 1910.00928 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2019physics.comp-ph cs.DC cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modeling of turbulent flows is still challenging. One way to deal with the large scale separation due to turbulence is to simulate only the large scales and model the unresolved contributions as done in large-eddy simulation (LES). This paper focuses on two deep learning (DL) strategies, regression and reconstruction, which are data-driven and promising alternatives to classical modeling concepts. Using three-dimensional (3-D) forced turbulence direct numerical simulation (DNS) data, subgrid models are evaluated, which predict the unresolved part of quantities based on the resolved solution. For regression, it is shown that feedforward artificial neural networks (ANNs) are able to predict the fully-resolved scalar dissipation rate using filtered input data. It was found that a combination of a large-scale quantity, such as the filtered passive scalar itself, and a small-scale quantity, such as the filtered energy dissipation rate, gives the best agreement with the actual DNS data. Furthermore, a DL network motivated by enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks (ESRGANs) was used to reconstruct fully-resolved 3-D velocity fields from filtered velocity fields. The energy spectrum shows very good agreement. As size of scientific data is often in the order of terabytes or more, DL needs to be combined with high performance computing (HPC). Necessary code improvements for HPC-DL are discussed with respect to the supercomputer JURECA. After optimizing the training code, 396.2 TFLOPS were achieved.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2.

6 papers.