mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dialogue Transformers

arXiv 1910.00486 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2019cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a dialogue policy based on a transformer architecture, where the self-attention mechanism operates over the sequence of dialogue turns. Recent work has used hierarchical recurrent neural networks to encode multiple utterances in a dialogue context, but we argue that a pure self-attention mechanism is more suitable. By default, an RNN assumes that every item in a sequence is relevant for producing an encoding of the full sequence, but a single conversation can consist of multiple overlapping discourse segments as speakers interleave multiple topics. A transformer picks which turns to include in its encoding of the current dialogue state, and is naturally suited to selectively ignoring or attending to dialogue history. We compare the performance of the Transformer Embedding Dialogue (TED) policy to an LSTM and to the REDP, which was specifically designed to overcome this limitation of RNNs.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 2.

13 papers.

Sort: