mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rejoinder on: Minimal penalties and the slope heuristics: a survey

arXiv 1909.13499 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2019math.ST stat.ME stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This text is the rejoinder following the discussion of a survey paper about minimal penalties and the slope heuristics (Arlot, 2019. Minimal penalties and the slope heuristics: a survey. Journal de la SFDS). While commenting on the remarks made by the discussants, it provides two new results about the slope heuristics for model selection among a collection of projection estimators in least-squares fixed-design regression. First, we prove that the slope heuristics works even when all models are significantly biased. Second, when the noise is Gaussian with a general dependence structure, we compute expectations of key quantities, showing that the slope heuristics certainly is valid in this setting also.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2.

2 papers.