Deep Video Deblurring: The Devil is in the Details
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Video deblurring for hand-held cameras is a challenging task, since the underlying blur is caused by both camera shake and object motion. State-of-the-art deep networks exploit temporal information from neighboring frames, either by means of spatio-temporal transformers or by recurrent architectures. In contrast to these involved models, we found that a simple baseline CNN can perform astonishingly well when particular care is taken w.r.t. the details of model and training procedure. To that end, we conduct a comprehensive study regarding these crucial details, uncovering extreme differences in quantitative and qualitative performance. Exploiting these details allows us to boost the architecture and training procedure of a simple baseline CNN by a staggering 3.15dB, such that it becomes highly competitive w.r.t. cutting-edge networks. This raises the question whether the reported accuracy difference between models is always due to technical contributions or also subject to such orthogonal, but crucial details.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022Flow-Guided Sparse Transformer for Video Deblurringcited by 43
- 2021Recurrent Video Deblurring with Blur-Invariant Motion Estimation and Pixel Volumescited by 41
- 2021Deep Recurrent Neural Network with Multi-scale Bi-directional Propagation for Video Deblurringcited by 25
- 2022Multi-Scale Memory-Based Video Deblurringcited by 16
- 2022Multi-Scale Memory-Based Video Deblurring6 Apr 2022
- 2022Flow-Guided Sparse Transformer for Video Deblurring6 Jan 2022
- 2021Deep Recurrent Neural Network with Multi-scale Bi-directional Propagation for Video Deblurring9 Dec 2021
- 2021Recurrent Video Deblurring with Blur-Invariant Motion Estimation and Pixel Volumes23 Aug 2021