Adversarial Deep Embedded Clustering: on a better trade-off between Feature Randomness and Feature Drift
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Clustering using deep autoencoders has been thoroughly investigated in recent years. Current approaches rely on simultaneously learning embedded features and clustering the data points in the latent space. Although numerous deep clustering approaches outperform the shallow models in achieving favorable results on several high-semantic datasets, a critical weakness of such models has been overlooked. In the absence of concrete supervisory signals, the embedded clustering objective function may distort the latent space by learning from unreliable pseudo-labels. Thus, the network can learn non-representative features, which in turn undermines the discriminative ability, yielding worse pseudo-labels. In order to alleviate the effect of random discriminative features, modern autoencoder-based clustering papers propose to use the reconstruction loss for pretraining and as a regularizer during the clustering phase. Nevertheless, a clustering-reconstruction trade-off can cause the textitFeature Drift phenomena. In this paper, we propose ADEC (Adversarial Deep Embedded Clustering) a novel autoencoder-based clustering model, which addresses a dual problem, namely, textitFeature Randomness and textitFeature Drift, using adversarial training. We empirically demonstrate the suitability of our model on handling these problems using benchmark real datasets. Experimental results validate that our model outperforms state-of-the-art autoencoder-based clustering methods.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2022Deep Clustering: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 78
- 2021Rethinking Graph Auto-Encoder Models for Attributed Graph Clusteringcited by 37
- 2021Pseudo-supervised Deep Subspace Clusteringcited by 29
- 2021Selective Pseudo-label Clusteringcited by 8
- 2024Deep Clustering Using the Soft Silhouette Score: Towards Compact and Well-Separated Clusterscited by 6
- 2022SOM-CPC: Unsupervised Contrastive Learning with Self-Organizing Maps for Structured Representations of High-Rate Time Seriescited by 4
- 2023A Contrastive Variational Graph Auto-Encoder for Node Clusteringcited by 4
- 2021Deep Variational Clustering Framework for Self-labeling of Large-scale Medical Imagescited by 3
- 2021Joint Debiased Representation Learning and Imbalanced Data Clusteringcited by 2
- 2022Deep clustering with fusion autoencodercited by 1
- 2024Deep Clustering via Distribution Learningcited by 0
- 2026Deep Sprite-based Image Models: An Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Deep Sprite-based Image Models: An Analysis21 Apr 2026
- 2024Deep Clustering via Distribution Learning6 Aug 2024
- 2024Deep Clustering Using the Soft Silhouette Score: Towards Compact and Well-Separated Clusters1 Feb 2024
- 2023A Contrastive Variational Graph Auto-Encoder for Node Clustering28 Dec 2023
- 2022Deep Clustering: A Comprehensive Survey9 Oct 2022
- 2022SOM-CPC: Unsupervised Contrastive Learning with Self-Organizing Maps for Structured Representations of High-Rate Time Series31 May 2022
- 2022Deep clustering with fusion autoencoder11 Jan 2022
- 2021Deep Variational Clustering Framework for Self-labeling of Large-scale Medical Images22 Sep 2021
- 2021Joint Debiased Representation Learning and Imbalanced Data Clustering11 Sep 2021
- 2021Selective Pseudo-label Clustering22 Jul 2021
- 2021Rethinking Graph Auto-Encoder Models for Attributed Graph Clustering19 Jul 2021
- 2021Pseudo-supervised Deep Subspace Clustering8 Apr 2021