Manifold Oblique Random Forests: Towards Closing the Gap on Convolutional Deep Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decision forests (Forests), in particular random forests and gradient boosting trees, have demonstrated state-of-the-art accuracy compared to other methods in many supervised learning scenarios. In particular, Forests dominate other methods in tabular data, that is, when the feature space is unstructured, so that the signal is invariant to a permutation of the feature indices. However, in structured data lying on a manifold (such as images, text, and speech) deep networks (Networks), specifically convolutional deep networks (ConvNets), tend to outperform Forests. We conjecture that at least part of the reason for this is that the input to Networks is not simply the feature magnitudes, but also their indices. In contrast, naive Forest implementations fail to explicitly consider feature indices. A recently proposed Forest approach demonstrates that Forests, for each node, implicitly sample a random matrix from some specific distribution. These Forests, like some classes of Networks, learn by partitioning the feature space into convex polytopes corresponding to linear functions. We build on that approach and show that one can choose distributions in a manifold-aware fashion to incorporate feature locality. We demonstrate the empirical performance on data whose features live on three different manifolds: a torus, images, and time-series. Moreover, we demonstrate its strength in multivariate simulated settings and also show superiority in predicting surgical outcome in epilepsy patients and predicting movement direction from raw stereotactic EEG data from non-motor brain regions. In all simulations and real data, Manifold Oblique Random Forest (MORF) algorithm outperforms approaches that ignore feature space structure and challenges the performance of ConvNets. Moreover, MORF runs fast and maintains interpretability and theoretical justification.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.
3 papers.
- 2024Mixed-curvature decision trees and random forestscited by 2
- 2024Mixed-Curvature Decision Trees and Random Forestscited by 0
- 2024Oblique Bayesian additive regression treescited by 0
- 2024Oblique Bayesian additive regression trees13 Nov 2024
- 2024Mixed-curvature decision trees and random forests3 Oct 2024
- 2024Mixed-Curvature Decision Trees and Random Forests7 Jun 2024