Graph Neural Reasoning May Fail in Certifying Boolean Unsatisfiability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is feasible and practically-valuable to bridge the characteristics between graph neural networks (GNNs) and logical reasoning. Despite considerable efforts and successes witnessed to solve Boolean satisfiability (SAT), it remains a mystery of GNN-based solvers for more complex predicate logic formulae. In this work, we conjectures with some evidences, that generally-defined GNNs present several limitations to certify the unsatisfiability (UNSAT) in Boolean formulae. It implies that GNNs may probably fail in learning the logical reasoning tasks if they contain proving UNSAT as the sub-problem included by most predicate logic formulae.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.
2 papers.
- 2021Goal-Aware Neural SAT Solvercited by 27
- 2023G4SATBench: Benchmarking and Advancing SAT Solving with Graph Neural Networkscited by 17
- 2023G4SATBench: Benchmarking and Advancing SAT Solving with Graph Neural Networks29 Sep 2023
- 2021Goal-Aware Neural SAT Solver14 Jun 2021