Google vs IBM: A Constraint Solving Challenge on the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The job-shop scheduling is one of the most studied optimization problems from the dawn of computer era to the present day. Its combinatorial nature makes it easily expressible as a constraint satisfaction problem. In this paper, we compare the performance of two constraint solvers on the job-shop scheduling problem. The solvers in question are: OR-Tools, an open-source solver developed by Google and winner of the last MiniZinc Challenge, and CP Optimizer, a proprietary IBM constraint solver targeted at industrial scheduling problems. The comparison is based on the goodness of the solutions found and the time required to solve the problem instances. First, we target the classic benchmarks from the literature, then we carry out the comparison on a benchmark that was created with known optimal solution, with size comparable to real-world industrial problems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
3 papers.
- 2024Solving a Real-World Package Delivery Routing Problem Using Quantum Annealerscited by 6
- 2024Leveraging Constraint Programming in a Deep Learning Approach for Dynamically Solving the Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Problemcited by 4
- 2021Large-Scale Benchmarks for the Job Shop Scheduling Problemcited by 0
- 2024Solving a Real-World Package Delivery Routing Problem Using Quantum Annealers22 Mar 2024
- 2024Leveraging Constraint Programming in a Deep Learning Approach for Dynamically Solving the Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Problem14 Mar 2024
- 2021Large-Scale Benchmarks for the Job Shop Scheduling Problem25 Jan 2021