Learning to Benchmark: Determining Best Achievable Misclassification Error from Training Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We address the problem of learning to benchmark the best achievable classifier performance. In this problem the objective is to establish statistically consistent estimates of the Bayes misclassification error rate without having to learn a Bayes-optimal classifier. Our learning to benchmark framework improves on previous work on learning bounds on Bayes misclassification rate since it learns the it exact Bayes error rate instead of a bound on error rate. We propose a benchmark learner based on an ensemble of ε-ball estimators and Chebyshev approximation. Under a smoothness assumption on the class densities we show that our estimator achieves an optimal (parametric) mean squared error (MSE) rate of O(N-1), where N is the number of samples. Experiments on both simulated and real datasets establish that our proposed benchmark learning algorithm produces estimates of the Bayes error that are more accurate than previous approaches for learning bounds on Bayes error probability.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2022Is the Performance of My Deep Network Too Good to Be True? A Direct Approach to Estimating the Bayes Error in Binary Classificationcited by 24
- 2021Evaluating State-of-the-Art Classification Models Against Bayes Optimalitycited by 15
- 2024Certified Robust Accuracy of Neural Networks Are Bounded due to Bayes Errorscited by 7
- 2025Practical estimation of the optimal classification error with soft labels and calibrationcited by 5
- 2024How Does Bayes Error Limit Probabilistic Robust Accuracycited by 2
- 2025Universal Training of Neural Networks to Achieve Bayes Optimal Classification Accuracycited by 1
- 2025Bayes Error Rate Estimation in Difficult Situationscited by 1
- 2025Bounding Neyman-Pearson Region with f-Divergencescited by 0
- 2025Revisiting GAN with Bayes-Optimal Discriminationcited by 0
- 2026Bayes-Optimal BER and AUC: Estimation and Evaluation of Estimatorscited by 0
- 2026Bayes-Optimal BER and AUC: Estimation and Evaluation of Estimators2 Sep 2026
- 2025Revisiting GAN with Bayes-Optimal Discrimination29 Oct 2025
- 2025Practical estimation of the optimal classification error with soft labels and calibration27 May 2025
- 2025Bayes Error Rate Estimation in Difficult Situations21 May 2025
- 2025Bounding Neyman-Pearson Region with f-Divergences13 May 2025
- 2025Universal Training of Neural Networks to Achieve Bayes Optimal Classification Accuracy13 Jan 2025
- 2024How Does Bayes Error Limit Probabilistic Robust Accuracy23 May 2024
- 2024Certified Robust Accuracy of Neural Networks Are Bounded due to Bayes Errors19 May 2024
- 2022Is the Performance of My Deep Network Too Good to Be True? A Direct Approach to Estimating the Bayes Error in Binary Classification1 Feb 2022
- 2021Evaluating State-of-the-Art Classification Models Against Bayes Optimality7 Jun 2021