mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bayesian Optimization under Heavy-tailed Payoffs

arXiv 1909.07040 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider black box optimization of an unknown function in the nonparametric Gaussian process setting when the noise in the observed function values can be heavy tailed. This is in contrast to existing literature that typically assumes sub-Gaussian noise distributions for queries. Under the assumption that the unknown function belongs to the Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS) induced by a kernel, we first show that an adaptation of the well-known GP-UCB algorithm with reward truncation enjoys sublinear tildeO(T^frac2 + α2(1+α)) regret even with only the (1+α)-th moments, α ∈ (0,1], of the reward distribution being bounded (tildeO hides logarithmic factors). However, for the common squared exponential (SE) and Mat'ern kernels, this is seen to be significantly larger than a fundamental Omega(T^frac11+α) lower bound on regret. We resolve this gap by developing novel Bayesian optimization algorithms, based on kernel approximation techniques, with regret bounds matching the lower bound in order for the SE kernel. We numerically benchmark the algorithms on environments based on both synthetic models and real-world data sets.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

21 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Design-Bench: Benchmarks for Data-Driven Offline Model-Based Optimizationcited by 96
  2. 2021Weighted Gaussian Process Bandits for Non-stationary Environmentscited by 30
  3. 2022On Kernelized Multi-Armed Bandits with Constraintscited by 23
  4. 2021No-Regret Algorithms for Time-Varying Bayesian Optimizationcited by 19
  5. 2021Risk-averse Heteroscedastic Bayesian Optimizationcited by 17
  6. 2021No-Regret Reinforcement Learning with Heavy-Tailed Rewardscited by 13
  7. 2022A Robust Phased Elimination Algorithm for Corruption-Tolerant Gaussian Process Banditscited by 11
  8. 2023Efficient Algorithms for Generalized Linear Bandits with Heavy-tailed Rewardscited by 11
  9. 2022Lower Bounds on the Worst-Case Complexity of Efficient Global Optimizationcited by 7
  10. 2023Quantum Heavy-tailed Banditscited by 7
  11. 2024Enhancing Gaussian Process Surrogates for Optimization and Posterior Approximation via Random Explorationcited by 7
  12. 2024Lower Bounds for Time-Varying Kernelized Banditscited by 5
9 more
  1. 2025Improved Regret Bounds for Linear Bandits with Heavy-Tailed Rewardscited by 4
  2. 2026Tighter Regret Lower Bound for Gaussian Process Bandits with Squared Exponential Kernel in Hyperspherecited by 4
  3. 2023(Private) Kernelized Bandits with Distributed Biased Feedbackcited by 3
  4. 2022On solutions of the distributional Bellman equationcited by 2
  5. 2023Trigonometric Quadrature Fourier Features for Scalable Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 1
  6. 2025Safe Bayesian optimization across noise models via scenario programmingcited by 1
  7. 2026Best-of-Both-Worlds for Heavy-Tailed Markov Decision Processescited by 1
  8. 2026On Uniform Error Bounds for Kernel Regression under Non-Gaussian Noisecited by 0
  9. 2026Robust Bayesian Optimization with Q-Exponential Surrogatescited by 0