Defending Against Adversarial Attacks by Suppressing the Largest Eigenvalue of Fisher Information Matrix
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a scheme for defending against adversarial attacks by suppressing the largest eigenvalue of the Fisher information matrix (FIM). Our starting point is one explanation on the rationale of adversarial examples. Based on the idea of the difference between a benign sample and its adversarial example is measured by the Euclidean norm, while the difference between their classification probability densities at the last (softmax) layer of the network could be measured by the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, the explanation shows that the output difference is a quadratic form of the input difference. If the eigenvalue of this quadratic form (a.k.a. FIM) is large, the output difference becomes large even when the input difference is small, which explains the adversarial phenomenon. This makes the adversarial defense possible by controlling the eigenvalues of the FIM. Our solution is adding one term representing the trace of the FIM to the loss function of the original network, as the largest eigenvalue is bounded by the trace. Our defensive scheme is verified by experiments using a variety of common attacking methods on typical deep neural networks, e.g. LeNet, VGG and ResNet, with datasets MNIST, CIFAR-10, and German Traffic Sign Recognition Benchmark (GTSRB). Our new network, after adopting the novel loss function and retraining, has an effective and robust defensive capability, as it decreases the fooling ratio of the generated adversarial examples, and remains the classification accuracy of the original network.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2023Adversarial robustness of amortized Bayesian inferencecited by 17
- 2021Adaptive Label Smoothing To Regularize Large-Scale Graph Trainingcited by 12
- 2021Stabilized Medical Image Attackscited by 10
- 2023Model Inversion Attack via Dynamic Memory Learningcited by 7
- 2022Adversarial attacks on neural networks through canonical Riemannian foliationscited by 5
- 2023Identifying Adversarially Attackable and Robust Samplescited by 5
- 2024Cartan moving frames and the data manifoldscited by 1
- 2026Measuring Model Robustness via Fisher Information: Spectral Bounds, Theoretical Guarantees, and Practical Algorithmscited by 1
- 2026Dynamics to decision: A mathematical theory of Lyapunov spectra and decision boundaries in deep classifierscited by 0
- 2026Dynamics to decision: A mathematical theory of Lyapunov spectra and decision boundaries in deep classifiers30 Sep 2026
- 2026Measuring Model Robustness via Fisher Information: Spectral Bounds, Theoretical Guarantees, and Practical Algorithms3 Jun 2026
- 2024Cartan moving frames and the data manifolds18 Sep 2024
- 2023Model Inversion Attack via Dynamic Memory Learning24 Aug 2023
- 2023Adversarial robustness of amortized Bayesian inference24 May 2023
- 2023Identifying Adversarially Attackable and Robust Samples30 Jan 2023
- 2022Adversarial attacks on neural networks through canonical Riemannian foliations2 Mar 2022
- 2021Adaptive Label Smoothing To Regularize Large-Scale Graph Training30 Aug 2021
- 2021Stabilized Medical Image Attacks9 Mar 2021