mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Lost in Evaluation: Misleading Benchmarks for Bilingual Dictionary Induction

arXiv 1909.05708 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2019cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The task of bilingual dictionary induction (BDI) is commonly used for intrinsic evaluation of cross-lingual word embeddings. The largest dataset for BDI was generated automatically, so its quality is dubious. We study the composition and quality of the test sets for five diverse languages from this dataset, with concerning findings: (1) a quarter of the data consists of proper nouns, which can be hardly indicative of BDI performance, and (2) there are pervasive gaps in the gold-standard targets. These issues appear to affect the ranking between cross-lingual embedding systems on individual languages, and the overall degree to which the systems differ in performance. With proper nouns removed from the data, the margin between the top two systems included in the study grows from 3.4% to 17.2%. Manual verification of the predictions, on the other hand, reveals that gaps in the gold standard targets artificially inflate the margin between the two systems on English to Bulgarian BDI from 0.1% to 6.7%. We thus suggest that future research either avoids drawing conclusions from quantitative results on this BDI dataset, or accompanies such evaluation with rigorous error analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

10 papers.