mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Candidate Generation with Binary Codes for Large-Scale Top-N Recommendation

arXiv 1909.05475 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2019cs.IRcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generating the Top-N recommendations from a large corpus is computationally expensive to perform at scale. Candidate generation and re-ranking based approaches are often adopted in industrial settings to alleviate efficiency problems. However it remains to be fully studied how well such schemes approximate complete rankings (or how many candidates are required to achieve a good approximation), or to develop systematic approaches to generate high-quality candidates efficiently. In this paper, we seek to investigate these questions via proposing a candidate generation and re-ranking based framework (CIGAR), which first learns a preference-preserving binary embedding for building a hash table to retrieve candidates, and then learns to re-rank the candidates using real-valued ranking models with a candidate-oriented objective. We perform a comprehensive study on several large-scale real-world datasets consisting of millions of users/items and hundreds of millions of interactions. Our results show that CIGAR significantly boosts the Top-N accuracy against state-of-the-art recommendation models, while reducing the query time by orders of magnitude. We hope that this work could draw more attention to the candidate generation problem in recommender systems.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

19 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Learning Vector-Quantized Item Representation for Transferable Sequential Recommenderscited by 112
  2. 2022DaisyRec 2.0: Benchmarking Recommendation for Rigorous Evaluationcited by 19
  3. 2021On component interactions in two-stage recommender systemscited by 14
  4. 2023Revisiting Neural Retrieval on Acceleratorscited by 14
  5. 2025Uncertainty Quantification and Decomposition for LLM-based Recommendationcited by 12
  6. 2021Dual Correction Strategy for Ranking Distillation in Top-N Recommender Systemcited by 10
  7. 2022Uncertainty Quantification for Fairness in Two-Stage Recommender Systemscited by 10
  8. 2021RecPipe: Co-designing Models and Hardware to Jointly Optimize Recommendation Quality and Performancecited by 8
  9. 2023Multi-domain Recommendation with Embedding Disentangling and Domain Alignmentcited by 7
  10. 2021Unsupervised Multi-Index Semantic Hashingcited by 5
  11. 2022kNN-Embed: Locally Smoothed Embedding Mixtures For Multi-interest Candidate Retrievalcited by 4
  12. 2021Position-based Hash Embeddings For Scaling Graph Neural Networkscited by 3
7 more
  1. 2025CoVE: Compressed Vocabulary Expansion Makes Better LLM-based Recommender Systemscited by 3
  2. 2023TwERC: High Performance Ensembled Candidate Generation for Ads Recommendation at Twittercited by 2
  3. 2023Reviewing Developments of Graph Convolutional Network Techniques for Recommendation Systemscited by 0
  4. 2024Are We Wasting Time? A Fast, Accurate Performance Evaluation Framework for Knowledge Graph Link Predictorscited by 0
  5. 2024Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Two Tower Recommendation Modelscited by 0
  6. 2026Filling the Gaps: Selective Knowledge Augmentation for LLM Recommenderscited by 0
  7. 2026OneShot: Index-in-Ranking with Neural Scoring for Large-Scale Retrievalcited by 0