Attention-Aware Age-Agnostic Visual Place Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A cross-domain visual place recognition (VPR) task is proposed in this work, i.e., matching images of the same architectures depicted in different domains. VPR is commonly treated as an image retrieval task, where a query image from an unknown location is matched with relevant instances from geo-tagged gallery database. Different from conventional VPR settings where the query images and gallery images come from the same domain, we propose a more common but challenging setup where the query images are collected under a new unseen condition. The two domains involved in this work are contemporary street view images of Amsterdam from the Mapillary dataset (source domain) and historical images of the same city from Beeldbank dataset (target domain). We tailored an age-invariant feature learning CNN that can focus on domain invariant objects and learn to match images based on a weakly supervised ranking loss. We propose an attention aggregation module that is robust to domain discrepancy between the train and the test data. Further, a multi-kernel maximum mean discrepancy (MK-MMD) domain adaptation loss is adopted to improve the cross-domain ranking performance. Both attention and adaptation modules are unsupervised while the ranking loss uses weak supervision. Visual inspection shows that the attention module focuses on built forms while the dramatically changing environment are less weighed. Our proposed CNN achieves state of the art results (99% accuracy) on the single-domain VPR task and 20% accuracy at its best on the cross-domain VPR task, revealing the difficulty of age-invariant VPR.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023R2Former: Unified Retrieval and Reranking Transformer for Place Recognitioncited by 102
- 2022Deep Visual Geo-localization Benchmarkcited by 84
- 2022AmsterTime: A Visual Place Recognition Benchmark Dataset for Severe Domain Shiftcited by 32
- 2023Are Local Features All You Need for Cross-Domain Visual Place Recognition?cited by 21
- 2021Place recognition survey: An update on deep learning approachescited by 13
- 2021Inside Out Visual Place Recognitioncited by 12
- 2025To Match or Not to Match: Revisiting Image Matching for Reliable Visual Place Recognitioncited by 3
- 2024LVLM-empowered Multi-modal Representation Learning for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 2
- 2026QdaVPR: A novel query-based domain-agnostic model for visual place recognitioncited by 1
- 2021Scene Retrieval for Contextual Visual Mappingcited by 0
- 2026QdaVPR: A novel query-based domain-agnostic model for visual place recognition8 Mar 2026
- 2025To Match or Not to Match: Revisiting Image Matching for Reliable Visual Place Recognition8 Apr 2025
- 2024LVLM-empowered Multi-modal Representation Learning for Visual Place Recognition9 Jul 2024
- 2023Are Local Features All You Need for Cross-Domain Visual Place Recognition?12 Apr 2023
- 2023R2Former: Unified Retrieval and Reranking Transformer for Place Recognition6 Apr 2023
- 2022Deep Visual Geo-localization Benchmark7 Apr 2022
- 2022AmsterTime: A Visual Place Recognition Benchmark Dataset for Severe Domain Shift30 Mar 2022
- 2021Inside Out Visual Place Recognition26 Nov 2021
- 2021Place recognition survey: An update on deep learning approaches19 Jun 2021
- 2021Scene Retrieval for Contextual Visual Mapping25 Feb 2021