Correcting Predictions for Approximate Bayesian Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian models quantify uncertainty and facilitate optimal decision-making in downstream applications. For most models, however, practitioners are forced to use approximate inference techniques that lead to sub-optimal decisions due to incorrect posterior predictive distributions. We present a novel approach that corrects for inaccuracies in posterior inference by altering the decision-making process. We train a separate model to make optimal decisions under the approximate posterior, combining interpretable Bayesian modeling with optimization of direct predictive accuracy in a principled fashion. The solution is generally applicable as a plug-in module for predictive decision-making for arbitrary probabilistic programs, irrespective of the posterior inference strategy. We demonstrate the approach empirically in several problems, confirming its potential.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Post-hoc loss-calibration for Bayesian neural networkscited by 9
- 2022Loss-calibrated expectation propagation for approximate Bayesian decision-makingcited by 5
- 2023Amortized Bayesian Decision Making for simulation-based modelscited by 1
- 2024Understanding and mitigating difficulties in posterior predictive evaluationcited by 1
- 2024Understanding and mitigating difficulties in posterior predictive evaluation30 May 2024
- 2023Amortized Bayesian Decision Making for simulation-based models5 Dec 2023
- 2022Loss-calibrated expectation propagation for approximate Bayesian decision-making10 Jan 2022
- 2021Post-hoc loss-calibration for Bayesian neural networks13 Jun 2021