Fixed-Horizon Temporal Difference Methods for Stable Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We explore fixed-horizon temporal difference (TD) methods, reinforcement learning algorithms for a new kind of value function that predicts the sum of rewards over a textitfixed number of future time steps. To learn the value function for horizon h, these algorithms bootstrap from the value function for horizon h-1, or some shorter horizon. Because no value function bootstraps from itself, fixed-horizon methods are immune to the stability problems that plague other off-policy TD methods using function approximation (also known as "the deadly triad"). Although fixed-horizon methods require the storage of additional value functions, this gives the agent additional predictive power, while the added complexity can be substantially reduced via parallel updates, shared weights, and n-step bootstrapping. We show how to use fixed-horizon value functions to solve reinforcement learning problems competitively with methods such as Q-learning that learn conventional value functions. We also prove convergence of fixed-horizon temporal difference methods with linear and general function approximation. Taken together, our results establish fixed-horizon TD methods as a viable new way of avoiding the stability problems of the deadly triad.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2025The Serial Scaling Hypothesiscited by 11
- 2021Truncated Emphatic Temporal Difference Methods for Prediction and Controlcited by 10
- 2022A policy gradient approach for Finite Horizon Constrained Markov Decision Processescited by 8
- 2024Critic as Lyapunov function (CALF): a model-free, stability-ensuring agentcited by 4
- 2021Finite Horizon Q-learning: Stability, Convergence, Simulations and an application on Smart Gridscited by 3
- 2022Chaining Value Functions for Off-Policy Learningcited by 3
- 2024Tensor Low-rank Approximation of Finite-horizon Value Functionscited by 3
- 2023Matryoshka Policy Gradient for Entropy-Regularized RL: Convergence and Global Optimalitycited by 2
- 2023The Construction of Reality in an AI: A Reviewcited by 1
- 2025Addressing Finite-Horizon MDPs via Low-Rank Tensor Value Approximationcited by 1
- 2026Quotient-Categorical Representations for Bellman-Compatible Average-Reward Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2024A novel agent with formal goal-reaching guarantees: an experimental study with a mobile robotcited by 0
- 2026Quotient-Categorical Representations for Bellman-Compatible Average-Reward Distributional Reinforcement Learning11 May 2026
- 2025The Serial Scaling Hypothesis16 Jul 2025
- 2025Addressing Finite-Horizon MDPs via Low-Rank Tensor Value Approximation17 Jan 2025
- 2024A novel agent with formal goal-reaching guarantees: an experimental study with a mobile robot23 Sep 2024
- 2024Critic as Lyapunov function (CALF): a model-free, stability-ensuring agent15 Sep 2024
- 2024Tensor Low-rank Approximation of Finite-horizon Value Functions27 May 2024
- 2023Matryoshka Policy Gradient for Entropy-Regularized RL: Convergence and Global Optimality22 Mar 2023
- 2023The Construction of Reality in an AI: A Review3 Feb 2023
- 2022A policy gradient approach for Finite Horizon Constrained Markov Decision Processes10 Oct 2022
- 2022Chaining Value Functions for Off-Policy Learning17 Jan 2022
- 2021Finite Horizon Q-learning: Stability, Convergence, Simulations and an application on Smart Grids27 Oct 2021
- 2021Truncated Emphatic Temporal Difference Methods for Prediction and Control11 Aug 2021