To lemmatize or not to lemmatize: how word normalisation affects ELMo performance in word sense disambiguation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We critically evaluate the widespread assumption that deep learning NLP models do not require lemmatized input. To test this, we trained versions of contextualised word embedding ELMo models on raw tokenized corpora and on the corpora with word tokens replaced by their lemmas. Then, these models were evaluated on the word sense disambiguation task. This was done for the English and Russian languages. The experiments showed that while lemmatization is indeed not necessary for English, the situation is different for Russian. It seems that for rich-morphology languages, using lemmatized training and testing data yields small but consistent improvements: at least for word sense disambiguation. This means that the decisions about text pre-processing before training ELMo should consider the linguistic nature of the language in question.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Linguistically inspired roadmap for building biologically reliable protein language modelscited by 7
- 2022RoMe: A Robust Metric for Evaluating Natural Language Generationcited by 6
- 2022ImmunoLingo: Linguistics-based formalization of the antibody languagecited by 2
- 2023Towards Resolving Word Ambiguity with Word Embeddingscited by 1
- 2023Towards Resolving Word Ambiguity with Word Embeddings25 Jul 2023
- 2022ImmunoLingo: Linguistics-based formalization of the antibody language26 Sep 2022
- 2022Linguistically inspired roadmap for building biologically reliable protein language models3 Jul 2022
- 2022RoMe: A Robust Metric for Evaluating Natural Language Generation17 Mar 2022