Additive function approximation in the brain
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many biological learning systems such as the mushroom body, hippocampus, and cerebellum are built from sparsely connected networks of neurons. For a new understanding of such networks, we study the function spaces induced by sparse random features and characterize what functions may and may not be learned. A network with d inputs per neuron is found to be equivalent to an additive model of order d, whereas with a degree distribution the network combines additive terms of different orders. We identify three specific advantages of sparsity: additive function approximation is a powerful inductive bias that limits the curse of dimensionality, sparse networks are stable to outlier noise in the inputs, and sparse random features are scalable. Thus, even simple brain architectures can be powerful function approximators. Finally, we hope that this work helps popularize kernel theories of networks among computational neuroscientists.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Generalization Bounds for Sparse Random Feature Expansionscited by 22
- 2022HARFE: Hard-Ridge Random Feature Expansioncited by 12
- 2021SHRIMP: Sparser Random Feature Models via Iterative Magnitude Pruningcited by 9
- 2024Sparsity-Aware Hardware-Software Co-Design of Spiking Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 0
- 2024Sparsity-Aware Hardware-Software Co-Design of Spiking Neural Networks: An Overview26 Aug 2024
- 2022HARFE: Hard-Ridge Random Feature Expansion6 Feb 2022
- 2021SHRIMP: Sparser Random Feature Models via Iterative Magnitude Pruning7 Dec 2021
- 2021Generalization Bounds for Sparse Random Feature Expansions4 Mar 2021