Tensor Oriented No-Reference Light Field Image Quality Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Light field image (LFI) quality assessment is becoming more and more important, which helps to better guide the acquisition, processing and application of immersive media. However, due to the inherent high dimensional characteristics of LFI, the LFI quality assessment turns into a multi-dimensional problem that requires consideration of the quality degradation in both spatial and angular dimensions. Therefore, we propose a novel Tensor oriented No-reference Light Field image Quality evaluator (Tensor-NLFQ) based on tensor theory. Specifically, since the LFI is regarded as a low-rank 4D tensor, the principal components of four oriented sub-aperture view stacks are obtained via Tucker decomposition. Then, the Principal Component Spatial Characteristic (PCSC) is designed to measure the spatial-dimensional quality of LFI considering its global naturalness and local frequency properties. Finally, the Tensor Angular Variation Index (TAVI) is proposed to measure angular consistency quality by analyzing the structural similarity distribution between the first principal component and each view in the view stack. Extensive experimental results on four publicly available LFI quality databases demonstrate that the proposed Tensor-NLFQ model outperforms state-of-the-art 2D, 3D, multi-view, and LFI quality assessment algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021No-Reference Quality Assessment for 360-degree Images by Analysis of Multi-frequency Information and Local-global Naturalnesscited by 20
- 2022Blind Quality Assessment of 3D Dense Point Clouds with Structure Guided Resamplingcited by 7
- 2022Dehazed Image Quality Evaluation: From Partial Discrepancy to Blind Perceptioncited by 5
- 2025Perceptual Visual Quality Assessment: Principles, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 5
- 2024Light Field Image Quality Assessment With Auxiliary Learning Based on Depthwise and Anglewise Separable Convolutionscited by 3
- 2025NVS-SQA: Exploring Self-Supervised Quality Representation Learning for Neurally Synthesized Scenes without Referencescited by 3
- 2023LFACon: Introducing Anglewise Attention to No-Reference Quality Assessment in Light Field Spacecited by 2
- 2024Perceptual Depth Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Omnidirectional Imagescited by 2
- 2024Subjective and Objective Quality-of-Experience Evaluation Study for Live Video Streamingcited by 1
- 2026Surveillance Facial Image Quality Assessment: A Multi-dimensional Dataset and Lightweight Modelcited by 1
- 2026Surveillance Facial Image Quality Assessment: A Multi-dimensional Dataset and Lightweight Model7 Feb 2026
- 2025Perceptual Visual Quality Assessment: Principles, Methods, and Future Directions1 Mar 2025
- 2025NVS-SQA: Exploring Self-Supervised Quality Representation Learning for Neurally Synthesized Scenes without References11 Jan 2025
- 2024Light Field Image Quality Assessment With Auxiliary Learning Based on Depthwise and Anglewise Separable Convolutions10 Dec 2024
- 2024Subjective and Objective Quality-of-Experience Evaluation Study for Live Video Streaming26 Sep 2024
- 2024Perceptual Depth Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Omnidirectional Images19 Aug 2024
- 2023LFACon: Introducing Anglewise Attention to No-Reference Quality Assessment in Light Field Space20 Mar 2023
- 2022Dehazed Image Quality Evaluation: From Partial Discrepancy to Blind Perception22 Nov 2022
- 2022Blind Quality Assessment of 3D Dense Point Clouds with Structure Guided Resampling31 Aug 2022
- 2021No-Reference Quality Assessment for 360-degree Images by Analysis of Multi-frequency Information and Local-global Naturalness22 Feb 2021