mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Table-to-Text Generation with Effective Hierarchical Encoder on Three Dimensions (Row, Column and Time)

arXiv 1909.02304 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2019cs.CLcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although Seq2Seq models for table-to-text generation have achieved remarkable progress, modeling table representation in one dimension is inadequate. This is because (1) the table consists of multiple rows and columns, which means that encoding a table should not depend only on one dimensional sequence or set of records and (2) most of the tables are time series data (e.g. NBA game data, stock market data), which means that the description of the current table may be affected by its historical data. To address aforementioned problems, not only do we model each table cell considering other records in the same row, we also enrich table's representation by modeling each table cell in context of other cells in the same column or with historical (time dimension) data respectively. In addition, we develop a table cell fusion gate to combine representations from row, column and time dimension into one dense vector according to the saliency of each dimension's representation. We evaluated our methods on ROTOWIRE, a benchmark dataset of NBA basketball games. Both automatic and human evaluation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our model with improvement of 2.66 in BLEU over the strong baseline and outperformance of state-of-the-art model.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Data-to-text Generation with Macro Planningcited by 34
  2. 2022Data-to-text Generation with Variational Sequential Planningcited by 17
  3. 2022Recent Advances in Neural Text Generation: A Task-Agnostic Surveycited by 14
  4. 2021Stage-wise Fine-tuning for Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 11
  5. 2022Innovations in Neural Data-to-text Generation: A Surveycited by 10
  6. 2021Generation Challenges: Results of the Accuracy Evaluation Shared Taskcited by 9
  7. 2024Synthetic SQL Column Descriptions and Their Impact on Text-to-SQL Performancecited by 6
  8. 2021LOGEN: Few-shot Logical Knowledge-Conditioned Text Generation with Self-trainingcited by 5
  9. 2025Columbo: Expanding Abbreviated Column Names for Tabular Data Using Large Language Modelscited by 5
  10. 2023Towards Table-to-Text Generation with Pretrained Language Model: A Table Structure Understanding and Text Deliberating Approachcited by 4
  11. 2024A Systematic Review of Data-to-Text NLGcited by 4
  12. 2023Plan-then-Seam: Towards Efficient Table-to-Text Generationcited by 2
6 more
  1. 2022DISK: Domain-constrained Instance Sketch for Math Word Problem Generationcited by 1
  2. 2024Impact of Model Size on Fine-tuned LLM Performance in Data-to-Text Generation: A State-of-the-Art Investigationcited by 1
  3. 2026TACO: Task-Aware Column Description Generation Using LLMscited by 1
  4. 2025Data Transformation Strategies to Remove Heterogeneitycited by 0
  5. 2025Towards Improving Interpretability of Language Model Generation through a Structured Knowledge Discovery Approachcited by 0
  6. 2026Frame-Guided Synthetic Claim Generation for Automatic Fact-Checking Using High-Volume Tabular Datacited by 0