On perfectness in Gaussian graphical models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Knowing when a graphical model is perfect to a distribution is essential in order to relate separation in the graph to conditional independence in the distribution, and this is particularly important when performing inference from data. When the model is perfect, there is a one-to-one correspondence between conditional independence statements in the distribution and separation statements in the graph. Previous work has shown that almost all models based on linear directed acyclic graphs as well as Gaussian chain graphs are perfect, the latter of which subsumes Gaussian graphical models (i.e., the undirected Gaussian models) as a special case. However, the complexity of chain graph models leads to a proof of this result which is indirect and mired by the complications of parameterizing this general class. In this paper, we directly approach the problem of perfectness for the Gaussian graphical models, and provide a new proof, via a more transparent parametrization, that almost all such models are perfect. Our approach is based on, and substantially extends, a construction of Lnvenivcka and Mat'uvs showing the existence of a perfect Gaussian distribution for any graph.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.