mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Avoiding Resentment Via Monotonic Fairness

arXiv 1909.01251 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2019stat.ML cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Classifiers that achieve demographic balance by explicitly using protected attributes such as race or gender are often politically or culturally controversial due to their lack of individual fairness, i.e. individuals with similar qualifications will receive different outcomes. Individually and group fair decision criteria can produce counter-intuitive results, e.g. that the optimal constrained boundary may reject intuitively better candidates due to demographic imbalance in similar candidates. Both approaches can be seen as introducing individual resentment, where some individuals would have received a better outcome if they either belonged to a different demographic class and had the same qualifications, or if they remained in the same class but had objectively worse qualifications (e.g. lower test scores). We show that both forms of resentment can be avoided by using monotonically constrained machine learning models to create individually fair, demographically balanced classifiers.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.