Revenue Maximization for Query Pricing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Buying and selling of data online has increased substantially over the last few years. Several frameworks have already been proposed that study query pricing in theory and practice. The key guiding principle in these works is the notion of em arbitrage-freeness where the broker can set different prices for different queries made to the dataset, but must ensure that the pricing function does not provide the buyers with opportunities for arbitrage. However, little is known about revenue maximization aspect of query pricing. In this paper, we study the problem faced by a broker selling access to data with the goal of maximizing her revenue. We show that this problem can be formulated as a revenue maximization problem with single-minded buyers and unlimited supply, for which several approximation algorithms are known. We perform an extensive empirical evaluation of the performance of several pricing algorithms for the query pricing problem on real-world instances. In addition to previously known approximation algorithms, we propose several new heuristics and analyze them both theoretically and experimentally. Our experiments show that algorithms with the best theoretical bounds are not necessarily the best empirically. We identify algorithms and heuristics that are both fast and also provide consistently good performance when valuations are drawn from a variety of distributions.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2021Data Pricing in Machine Learning Pipelinescited by 17
- 2022Variance reduced Shapley value estimation for trustworthy data valuationcited by 16
- 2021FL-Market: Trading Private Models in Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2023A Survey of Data Pricing for Data Marketplacescited by 6
- 2023Addressing Budget Allocation and Revenue Allocation in Data Market Environments Using an Adaptive Sampling Algorithmcited by 5
- 2024Uncertainty Quantification of Data Shapley via Statistical Inferencecited by 2
- 2023Differentially Private Online Item Pricingcited by 0
- 2024A Bargaining-based Approach for Feature Trading in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2025T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Servingcited by 0
- 2026DaDaDa: A Dataset for Data Pricing in Data Marketplacescited by 0
- 2026Rent-a-RAG: Embedding-Space Watermarks for Auditing Third-Party RAGcited by 0
- 2026Rent-a-RAG: Embedding-Space Watermarks for Auditing Third-Party RAG3 Sep 2026
- 2026DaDaDa: A Dataset for Data Pricing in Data Marketplaces13 Jun 2026
- 2025T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Serving26 Sep 2025
- 2024Uncertainty Quantification of Data Shapley via Statistical Inference28 Jul 2024
- 2024A Bargaining-based Approach for Feature Trading in Vertical Federated Learning23 Feb 2024
- 2023Addressing Budget Allocation and Revenue Allocation in Data Market Environments Using an Adaptive Sampling Algorithm5 Jun 2023
- 2023Differentially Private Online Item Pricing19 May 2023
- 2023A Survey of Data Pricing for Data Marketplaces7 Mar 2023
- 2022Variance reduced Shapley value estimation for trustworthy data valuation30 Oct 2022
- 2021Data Pricing in Machine Learning Pipelines18 Aug 2021
- 2021FL-Market: Trading Private Models in Federated Learning8 Jun 2021