Rewarding High-Quality Data via Influence Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider a crowdsourcing data acquisition scenario, such as federated learning, where a Center collects data points from a set of rational Agents, with the aim of training a model. For linear regression models, we show how a payment structure can be designed to incentivize the agents to provide high-quality data as early as possible, based on a characterization of the influence that data points have on the loss function of the model. Our contributions can be summarized as follows: (a) we prove theoretically that this scheme ensures truthful data reporting as a game-theoretic equilibrium and further demonstrate its robustness against mixtures of truthful and heuristic data reports, (b) we design a procedure according to which the influence computation can be efficiently approximated and processed sequentially in batches over time, (c) we develop a theory that allows correcting the difference between the influence and the overall change in loss and (d) we evaluate our approach on real datasets, confirming our theoretical findings.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021GTG-Shapley: Efficient and Accurate Participant Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learningcited by 73
- 2025Ten Challenging Problems in Federated Foundation Modelscited by 20
- 2021Data Pricing in Machine Learning Pipelinescited by 17
- 2021FedCCEA : A Practical Approach of Client Contribution Evaluation for Federated Learningcited by 14
- 2021FL-Market: Trading Private Models in Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2021Is Shapley Value fair? Improving Client Selection for Mavericks in Federated Learningcited by 7
- 2023GMValuator: Similarity-based Data Valuation for Generative Modelscited by 5
- 2024On the Volatility of Shapley-Based Contribution Metrics in Federated Learningcited by 2
- 2024Influence-based Attributions can be Manipulatedcited by 2
- 2023Hire When You Need to: Gradual Participant Recruitment for Auction-based Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2024History-Aware and Dynamic Client Contribution in Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2025Ten Challenging Problems in Federated Foundation Models14 Feb 2025
- 2024Influence-based Attributions can be Manipulated8 Sep 2024
- 2024On the Volatility of Shapley-Based Contribution Metrics in Federated Learning13 May 2024
- 2024History-Aware and Dynamic Client Contribution in Federated Learning11 Mar 2024
- 2023Hire When You Need to: Gradual Participant Recruitment for Auction-based Federated Learning4 Oct 2023
- 2023GMValuator: Similarity-based Data Valuation for Generative Models21 Apr 2023
- 2021GTG-Shapley: Efficient and Accurate Participant Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning5 Sep 2021
- 2021Data Pricing in Machine Learning Pipelines18 Aug 2021
- 2021Is Shapley Value fair? Improving Client Selection for Mavericks in Federated Learning20 Jun 2021
- 2021FL-Market: Trading Private Models in Federated Learning8 Jun 2021
- 2021FedCCEA : A Practical Approach of Client Contribution Evaluation for Federated Learning4 Jun 2021