mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Facet-Aware Evaluation for Extractive Summarization

arXiv 1908.10383 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2019cs.CL cs.IRcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Commonly adopted metrics for extractive summarization focus on lexical overlap at the token level. In this paper, we present a facet-aware evaluation setup for better assessment of the information coverage in extracted summaries. Specifically, we treat each sentence in the reference summary as a textitfacet, identify the sentences in the document that express the semantics of each facet as textitsupport sentences of the facet, and automatically evaluate extractive summarization methods by comparing the indices of extracted sentences and support sentences of all the facets in the reference summary. To facilitate this new evaluation setup, we construct an extractive version of the CNN/Daily Mail dataset and perform a thorough quantitative investigation, through which we demonstrate that facet-aware evaluation manifests better correlation with human judgment than ROUGE, enables fine-grained evaluation as well as comparative analysis, and reveals valuable insights of state-of-the-art summarization methods. Data can be found at https://github.com/morningmoni/FAR.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 1.

5 papers.