mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Quantum algorithms for Second-Order Cone Programming and Support Vector Machines

arXiv 1908.06720 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2019quant-ph cs.DS stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a quantum interior-point method (IPM) for second-order cone programming (SOCP) that runs in time widetildeO left( n√r fraczeta kappaδ2 log left(1/εright) right) where r is the rank and n the dimension of the SOCP, δ bounds the distance of intermediate solutions from the cone boundary, zeta is a parameter upper bounded by √n, and kappa is an upper bound on the condition number of matrices arising in the classical IPM for SOCP. The algorithm takes as its input a suitable quantum description of an arbitrary SOCP and outputs a classical description of a δ-approximate ε-optimal solution of the given problem. Furthermore, we perform numerical simulations to determine the values of the aforementioned parameters when solving the SOCP up to a fixed precision ε. We present experimental evidence that in this case our quantum algorithm exhibits a polynomial speedup over the best classical algorithms for solving general SOCPs that run in time O(nω+0.5) (here, ω is the matrix multiplication exponent, with a value of roughly 2.37 in theory, and up to 3 in practice). For the case of random SVM (support vector machine) instances of size O(n), the quantum algorithm scales as O(nk), where the exponent k is estimated to be 2.59 using a least-squares power law. On the same family random instances, the estimated scaling exponent for an external SOCP solver is 3.31 while that for a state-of-the-art SVM solver is 3.11.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.