mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pearson Distance is not a Distance

arXiv 1908.06029 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2019stat.ME stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Pearson distance between a pair of random variables X,Y with correlation ρxy, namely, 1-ρxy, has gained widespread use, particularly for clustering, in areas such as gene expression analysis, brain imaging and cyber security. In all these applications it is implicitly assumed/required that the distance measures be metrics, thus satisfying the triangle inequality. We show however, that Pearson distance is not a metric. We go on to show that this can be repaired by recalling the result, (well known in other literature) that √1-ρxy is a metric. We similarly show that a related measure of interest, 1-|ρxy|, which is invariant to the sign of ρxy, is not a metric but that √1-ρxy2 is. We also give generalizations of these results.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.