mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AI-based Prediction of Independent Construction Safety Outcomes from Universal Attributes

arXiv 1908.05972 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper significantly improves on, and finishes to validate, an approach proposed in previous research in which safety outcomes were predicted from attributes with machine learning. Like in the original study, we use Natural Language Processing (NLP) to extract fundamental attributes from raw incident reports and machine learning models are trained to predict safety outcomes. The outcomes predicted here are injury severity, injury type, body part impacted, and incident type. However, unlike in the original study, safety outcomes were not extracted via NLP but were provided by independent human annotations, eliminating any potential source of artificial correlation between predictors and predictands. Results show that attributes are still highly predictive, confirming the validity of the original approach. Other improvements brought by the current study include the use of (1) a much larger dataset featuring more than 90,000 reports, (2) two new models, XGBoost and linear SVM (Support Vector Machines), (3) model stacking, (4) a more straightforward experimental setup with more appropriate performance metrics, and (5) an analysis of per-category attribute importance scores. Finally, the injury severity outcome is well predicted, which was not the case in the original study. This is a significant advancement.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3.

5 papers.