Federated Learning with Additional Mechanisms on Clients to Reduce Communication Costs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) enables on-device training over distributed networks consisting of a massive amount of modern smart devices, such as smartphones and IoT (Internet of Things) devices. However, the leading optimization algorithm in such settings, i.e., federated averaging (FedAvg), suffers from heavy communication costs and the inevitable performance drop, especially when the local data is distributed in a non-IID way. To alleviate this problem, we propose two potential solutions by introducing additional mechanisms to the on-device training. The first (FedMMD) is adopting a two-stream model with the MMD (Maximum Mean Discrepancy) constraint instead of a single model in vanilla FedAvg to be trained on devices. Experiments show that the proposed method outperforms baselines, especially in non-IID FL settings, with a reduction of more than 20% in required communication rounds. The second is FL with feature fusion (FedFusion). By aggregating the features from both the local and global models, we achieve higher accuracy at fewer communication costs. Furthermore, the feature fusion modules offer better initialization for newly incoming clients and thus speed up the process of convergence. Experiments in popular FL scenarios show that our FedFusion outperforms baselines in both accuracy and generalization ability while reducing the number of required communication rounds by more than 60%.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
12 papers.
- 2023Heterogeneous Federated Learning: State-of-the-art and Research Challengescited by 160
- 2023MP-FedCL: Multiprototype Federated Contrastive Learning for Edge Intelligencecited by 20
- 2022Continual Learning for Peer-to-Peer Federated Learning: A Study on Automated Brain Metastasis Identificationcited by 13
- 2024FedCCL: Federated Dual-Clustered Feature Contrast Under Domain Heterogeneitycited by 5
- 2022A Convergence Theory for Federated Average: Beyond Smoothnesscited by 4
- 2024Logit Calibration and Feature Contrast for Robust Federated Learning on Non-IID Datacited by 4
- 2024Federated Distillation for Medical Image Classification: Towards Trustworthy Computer-Aided Diagnosiscited by 4
- 2025FedMVP: Federated Multimodal Visual Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 4
- 2022TinyMLOps: Operational Challenges for Widespread Edge AI Adoptioncited by 3
- 2022CC-FedAvg: Computationally Customized Federated Averagingcited by 2
- 2022FedCos: A Scene-adaptive Federated Optimization Enhancement for Performance Improvementcited by 1
- 2025Adaptive Latent-Space Constraints in Personalized Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2025Adaptive Latent-Space Constraints in Personalized Federated Learning12 May 2025
- 2025FedMVP: Federated Multimodal Visual Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models29 Apr 2025
- 2024Federated Distillation for Medical Image Classification: Towards Trustworthy Computer-Aided Diagnosis2 Jul 2024
- 2024FedCCL: Federated Dual-Clustered Feature Contrast Under Domain Heterogeneity14 Apr 2024
- 2024Logit Calibration and Feature Contrast for Robust Federated Learning on Non-IID Data10 Apr 2024
- 2023Heterogeneous Federated Learning: State-of-the-art and Research Challenges20 Jul 2023
- 2023MP-FedCL: Multiprototype Federated Contrastive Learning for Edge Intelligence1 Apr 2023
- 2022CC-FedAvg: Computationally Customized Federated Averaging28 Dec 2022
- 2022A Convergence Theory for Federated Average: Beyond Smoothness3 Nov 2022
- 2022Continual Learning for Peer-to-Peer Federated Learning: A Study on Automated Brain Metastasis Identification26 Apr 2022
- 2022FedCos: A Scene-adaptive Federated Optimization Enhancement for Performance Improvement7 Apr 2022
- 2022TinyMLOps: Operational Challenges for Widespread Edge AI Adoption21 Mar 2022